MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Mathematical Model of Tissue Oxygenation in Early Sepsis

2008· article· en· W3173900688 on OpenAlexafffund
Graham Fraser, Daniel Goldman, Christopher G. Ellis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSepsisOxygenationPerforationBlood flowHemodynamicsMedicineIn vivoSubcutaneous tissueSkeletal muscleLean tissueCardiologyAnatomyAnesthesiaAdipose tissueInternal medicinePathologyBiologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The defining characteristic of sepsis is a progressive microvascular dysfunction remote to the locus of infection. Our objective was to quantify the time course of changing tissue PO 2 due to microvascular injury in early sepsis using an established mathematical model. Experimental data obtained from a rat cecal‐ligation and perforation (CLP) model of sepsis has demonstrated a progressive FCD loss at 2, 3 and 4 hours (11±4%, 15±1%, 21±5% SHAM vs 18±3%, 32±5%, 48±7% CLP respectively). Microvascular blood flow was recorded in skeletal muscle using dual wavelength intra‐vital video microscopy. Capillaries were analyzed at baseline in vivo for O 2 saturations and hemodynamics. Custom vascular mapping software was used to reconstruct the real geometry (length, diameter, tissue depth and connections between vessels) of the experimental network (Volume 420 × 420 × 60 μm ). A constant consumption computational model applied to the FCD conditions at each time point found mean tissue PO 2 was not different between SHAM and CLP at 2 hours (34.2±4.3 vs 33.3±4.2 mmHg) or 3 hours (33.0±4.3 vs 31.2±4.5 mmHg) post. At 4 hours tissue PO 2 was significantly different between SHAM and CLP (32.7±4.3 vs 25.9±6.5 mmHg, p < 0.01). This simulation suggests that a substantial FCD loss precedes a significant decrease in tissue oxygenation due to diffusional exchange between adjacent capillaries. Supported by CIHR grant to DG and CGE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→