La compétence interculturelle et l’humour comme stratégie dans le contexte du management international
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’inscrit au carrefour de la sociologie, de l’anthropologie, de la linguistique et de la pragmatique interculturelle. Il porte sur les compétences interculturelles et, plus particulièrement, sur l’humour comme stratégie de communication en milieu professionnel international. D’une part, nous donnons un aperçu des possibilités et des limites de l’humour dans les interactions entre personnes d’appartenances différentes. D’autre part, nous nous intéressons aux compétences clés de managers qui travaillent dans des contextes sociaux complexes. Nous présenterons d’abord un état des lieux sur l’humour dans le management international. Puis, sur la base d’une étude de cas, nous examinerons les fonctions et les effets de l’humour dans les interactions avant d’aborder la question des compétences de communication nécessaires pour travailler sur les scènes internationales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".