Dynamic Hybrid Relation Exploration Network for Cross-Domain Context-Dependent Semantic Parsing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Semantic parsing has long been a fundamental problem in natural language processing. Recently, cross-domain context-dependent semantic parsing has become a new focus of research. Central to the problem is the challenge of leveraging contextual information of both natural language queries and database schemas in the interaction history. In this paper, we present a dynamic graph framework that is capable of effectively modelling contextual utterances, tokens, database schemas, and their complicated interaction as the conversation proceeds. The framework employs a dynamic memory decay mechanism that incorporates inductive bias to integrate enriched contextual relation representation, which is further enhanced with a powerful reranking model. At the time of writing, we demonstrate that the proposed framework outperforms all existing models by large margins, achieving new state-of-the-art performance on two large-scale benchmarks, the SParC and CoSQL datasets. Specifically, the model attains a 55.8% question-match and 30.8% interaction-match accuracy on SParC, and a 46.8% question-match and 17.0% interaction-match accuracy on CoSQL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it