MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Splenic neural modulation of mesenteric vascular tone

2008· article· en· W3173975019 on OpenAlexaff
Shereen M. Hamza, Susan Kaufman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDenervationSplanchnicSplenic veinOcclusionAnesthesiaSplanchnic nervesSuperior mesenteric arteryMesenteric VeinMesenteric arteriesSplenic arteryInternal medicineBlood pressureCardiologyAnatomyHemodynamicsPortal hypertensionSurgeryArteryStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Portal hypertension impedes outflow from the splanchnic vascular beds. We hypothesized that the increase in splenic intravascular pressure may initiate a neural reflex to increase mesenteric arterial tone and reduce blood flow into the plethoric mesenteric vascular bed. Splenic venous pressure was selectively increased by partial splenic vein occlusion (6.9±0.5 to 22.5±0.3 mmHg, n=47). During the 3 minutes following occlusion, mesenteric vascular conductance fell (−0.01±0.002 mmHg/mL·min ‐1 ; p<0.05 n=7), an effect which was unchanged by renal denervation (−0.01±0.009 mmHg/mL·min ‐1 ; n=6) and exacerbated by mesenteric denervation (−0.02±0.004 mmHg/mL·min ‐1 ; p<0.05, n=7). The fall in conductance was abolished by splenic denervation (−0.002±0.002 mmHg/mL·min ‐1 ; p<0.05 n=6). Similarly, the significant increase in mesenteric efferent nerve activity observed during splenic venous occlusion (22.2±2.8 to 27.9±3.8 spikes/sec, p<0.05 n=13) was absent after splenic denervation (32.4±2.4 to 31.2±1.6 spikes/sec, n=7). Although the spleen is thus integral to initiating the reflex, the accompanying increase in mesenteric nerve activity is not wholly responsible for increasing mesenteric arterial tone. (HSFC,CIHR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicLiver Disease and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207