MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174008706 · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2021.3091933

Safety and Stability Guarantees for Control Loops With Deep Learning Perception

2021· article· en· W3174008706 on OpenAlexaff
Matteo Marchi, Jonathan Bunton, Bahman Gharesifard, Paulo Tabuada

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Control Systems Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersArmy Research LaboratoryAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)Stability (learning theory)Artificial neural networkDeep learningComputer sciencePerceptionControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligencePipeline (software)State (computer science)Control systemControl engineeringControl (management)Machine learningEngineeringAlgorithmPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning is currently used in the perception pipeline of autonomous systems, such as when estimating the system state from camera and LiDAR measurements. While this practice is typical, hard guarantees on the worst-case behavior of the closed-loop system are rare. In this letter, however, we leverage recent results on neural network approximation, combined with classical input-to-state stability (ISS) properties, and show how to design deep neural networks for state estimation that guarantee the safety and stability of the resulting closed-loop system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Control Systems LettersSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207