MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174008706 · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2021.3091933

Safety and Stability Guarantees for Control Loops With Deep Learning Perception

2021· article· en· W3174008706 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Control Systems Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersArmy Research LaboratoryAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)Stability (learning theory)Artificial neural networkDeep learningComputer sciencePerceptionControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligencePipeline (software)State (computer science)Control systemControl engineeringControl (management)Machine learningEngineeringAlgorithmPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning is currently used in the perception pipeline of autonomous systems, such as when estimating the system state from camera and LiDAR measurements. While this practice is typical, hard guarantees on the worst-case behavior of the closed-loop system are rare. In this letter, however, we leverage recent results on neural network approximation, combined with classical input-to-state stability (ISS) properties, and show how to design deep neural networks for state estimation that guarantee the safety and stability of the resulting closed-loop system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it