Abstract P146: Transient Neonatal High Oxygen Exposure Accelerates Adult Cardiac Baseline and Ang Ii-induced Prooxidative and Proinflammatory Responses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Preterm birth is associated with disequilibrated early life oxidant-antioxidant and proinflammatory conditions that can be carried into adulthood and contribute to the development of organ dysfunction. Neonatally high O 2 -exposed rats, a model of prematurity-related prooxidative conditions, exhibit adult hypertension, early cardiac dysfunction and fibrosis, and premature angiotensin (ANG) II-induced heart failure. We hypothesized that neonatal high O 2 exposure will exaggerate baseline and ANG II-induced cardiac prooxidative and proinflammatory gene expression in adult rats. Design and Methods: Sprague-Dawley pups were kept in 80% O 2 (H group) or room air (NNI group) from day 3-10 of life. Twelve-weeks-old H and NNI rats were infused with ANG II (100 ng.kg -1 .min -1 ) or saline (NaCl) for 4 weeks (n = 4 per group). RNA extracted from hearts was used in arrays to assess expression of oxidative stress and inflammatory genes. Data is expressed as fold change (F.C.) compared to control NNI+NaCl. Results: H+NaCl exhibited increased baseline Cd68 expression (F.C: 1.47; P<0.05 vs control), tendancy of increased Nfkb1 and Tnf expression (1.52 and 1.48), and a tendancy of decreased Il1b and Il18 expression (0.72 and 0.78). H+ANGII versus NNI+ANGII exhibited similar increase in Tnf ( 2.12 vs 2.13; P<0.05 vs control), greater increase in Cd14 , Cd68 , and Nfkb1 (2.5 vs 1.78, 2.13 vs 1.94, 2.0 vs 1.7; P<0.05 vs controls), and a greater tendancy of increase in Tgfb1 , Myd88 , Cybb , and Gstp1 (2.68 vs 1.82, 2.37 vs 1.31, 1.91 vs 0.98, 2.45 vs 1.61) expression. NNI+ANGII versus H+ANGII exhibited greater increase in expression of genes involved in early inflammatory process, including Ccl2 , Icam1 , and Vcam1 (2.07 vs 1.56, 1.88 vs 1.36, 2.34 vs 1.29; P<0.05 vs control). Conclusions: Neonatal high O 2 exposure accelerates baseline and ANG II-induced cardiac prooxidative and proinflammatory responses in adult rats, which could account for early cardiac abnormalities and premature ANG II-induced heart failure in this model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".