MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The binding and activation of Nitric Oxide Synthase by modified central linker and “phosphomimetic” Calmodulin proteins

2008· article· en· W3174055413 on OpenAlexafffund
Odi K Israel, Donald E. Spratt, Valentina Taiakina, J. Guy Guillemette

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLinkerCalmodulinChemistryNitric oxide synthaseBiophysicsBiochemistryEnzymeBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calmodulin (CaM) is a ubiquitous calcium‐binding protein that is known to interact and regulate hundreds of intercellular functional proteins. The promiscuity of CaM is partially due to its highly flexible central linker region that separates its two terminal domains which interact with its target protein. Modification of the central linker region of CaM can result in changes in the proximity of the two terminal domains, their relative orientation, binding affinity and activation of the CaM target proteins. The present study was designed to investigate the role of the central linker of CaM by introducing select mutations, including phosphomimetic residues, into the CaM central linker region. The effects of these modifications on the binding and activation of the three mammalian nitric oxide synthase (NOS) isozymes have been investigated using biophysical techniques including circular dichroism, FTIR and gel shift mobility assays. Assays have been performed to assess the effect that modified CaM linker residues have on NOS enzyme activation and electron transfer. This research is supported by NSERC (J.G.G.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects→French-language works237,207→