Longitudinal In-Bed Pressure Signals Decomposition and Gradients Analysis for Pressure Injury Monitoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pressure injury (PI) is a major problem for patients that are bound to a wheelchair or bed, such as seniors or people with spinal cord injuries. This condition can be life threatening in its later stages. It can be very costly to the healthcare system as well. Fortunately with proper monitoring and assessment, PI development can be prevented. The major factor that causes PI is prolonged interface pressure between the body and the support surface. A possible solution to reduce the chance of developing PI is changing the patient's in-bed pose at appropriate times. Monitoring in-bed pressure can help healthcare providers to locate high-pressure areas, and remove or minimize pressure on those regions. The current clinical method of interface pressure monitoring is limited by periodic snapshot assessments, without longitudinal measurements and analysis. In this paper we propose a pressure signal analysis pipeline to automatically eliminate external artefacts from pressure data, estimate a person's pose, and locate and track high-risk regions over time so that necessary attention can be provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".