MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174162781 · doi:10.1145/3461837.3464515

R2GSync and edge views

2021· article· en· W3174162781 on OpenAlexaff
Nafisa Anzum, Semih Salihoğlu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRelational database management systemJoinssyncGraphRelational databaseSynchronization (alternating current)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionTheoretical computer scienceJoin (topology)Set (abstract data type)DatabaseInformation retrievalProgramming languageComputer networkArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graph databases that are used in enterprises are primarily extracted from a main transactional store that is often an RDBMS. This data infrastructure set up raises the challenge of keeping the extracted graph in a graph database management system (GDBMS) in sync with the source RDBMS. When the extracted graphs contain edge types that are results of join queries, this synchronization requires incrementally maintaining these join queries. In this paper, we investigate an alternative design where we can map the individual relations in these joins to virtual nodes and edges to keep the synchronization very efficient and instead support view-based querying in the GDBMS. We present a system called R2GSync, that synchronizes an RDBMS with a GDBMS and our accompanying edge view design for a GDBMS. We describe our implementation of edge views in GraphflowDB and query optimization techniques for improving the performance of queries that involve edge views.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGraph Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207