MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pheochromocytoma and Takotsubo’s Cardiomyopathy Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Support: A Report of Two Cases and Review of Takotsubo’s Cardiomyopathy Subtypes

2021· article· en· W3174238592 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tharsan Kanagalingam, Satyam Sarma, A Azab, Karen Gomez-Hernandez

Bibliographic record

VenueAustin Journal of Endocrinology and Diabetes · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPheochromocytomaCardiogenic shockCardiomyopathyMedicineParagangliomaCardiologyInternal medicineShock (circulatory)Heart failureSurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma (PPGL) are rare neuroendocrine catecholamine secreting tumours that may vary widely in their clinical presentation. Previous case series describe 12% of PPGL patients initially presenting with cardiac complications. Pheochromocytoma-related Takotsubo’s cardiomyopathy has been well described in the literature and may present with primarily basal dyskinesis (inverted subtype), apical dyskinesis (classic subtype), or global dyskinesis. Basal dyskineses has been more commonly described in pheochromocytoma-related Takotsubo’s cardiomyopathy. We present two cases of severe cardiogenic shock requiring Extra-Corporeal Membrane Support (ECMO) with Takotsubo’s cardiomyopathy secondary to pheochromocytoma at University Health Network, Toronto. In both cases, the pheochromocytoma was incidentally discovered on imaging. Both patients responded favourably to ECMO and alpha-adrenergic blockade with recovery of ejection fraction. Both received adrenalectomy as an outpatient with successful recovery. Although rare, PPGL should be considered in younger patients presenting with severe unexplained cardiogenic shock and Takotsubo’s cardiomyopathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustin Journal of Endocrinology and DiabetesSame topicAdrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsFrench-language works237,207