MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174263588 · doi:10.33137/q.i..v41i2.36774

In sonno e in veglia: l’esperienza della soglia e la scrittura del dormiveglia

2021· article· it· W3174263588 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Flavia Caporuscio

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni d italianistica · 2021
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nel panorama delle rielaborazioni novecentesche dell’immaginario purgatoriale può senz’altro collocarsi In sonno e in veglia (1987) di Anna Maria Ortese, il cui richiamo al luogo intermedio dell’aldilà cattolico è presente tanto nell’oggetto della narrazione quanto nella scrittura stessa. La raccolta di racconti è in realtà un libro-manifesto che svela il segreto della scrittura in un titolo programmatico: il binomio ossimorico di sonno e veglia circoscrive infatti sia la tecnica narrativa visionaria, sia la Weltanschauung dell’opera ortesiana che, qui come altrove, accoglie “storie tra mondo e sottomondo, tra giorno e notte.” La scrittura di apparizioni e visioni, tipica della narrativa ortesiana, abitando la soglia tra sogno e realtà, che è poi lo spazio liminale tra visibile e invisibile, autorizza all’uso della definizione di scrittura del dormiveglia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaderni d italianisticaSame topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207