Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article en deux parties révèle certains biais de notre roman national concernant le rôle des relations franco-autochtones dans l’implantation et l’ascension sociale des colons français. Il s’agit ici d’interroger ce dont témoigne historiquement la présence autochtone dans et autour de mon arbre généalogique, c’est-à-dire mon roman familial . Ainsi quand je remonte les lignées féminines, les relations d’intimité avec les Autochtones apparaissent clairement dans les mariages, les cousinages, les amitiés et … l’exploitation impérialiste et esclavagiste. Dans cette première partie, le cas des aïeules autochtones permet de revisiter ce que l’on sait du dessein impérial français de « ne faire qu’un seul peuple », en mettant en lumière, d’une part, le projet de francisation des Autochtones et, d’autre part, l’ ensauvagement des Français, tant décrié par les autorités civiles et religieuses françaises du xvii e et xviii e siècles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".