VSS: variance-stabilized signals for sequencing-based genomic signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: A sequencing-based genomic assay such as ChIP-seq outputs a real-valued signal for each position in the genome that measures the strength of activity at that position. Most genomic signals lack the property of variance stabilization. That is, a difference between 0 and 100 reads usually has a very different statistical importance from a difference between 1000 and 1100 reads. A statistical model such as a negative binomial distribution can account for this pattern, but learning these models is computationally challenging. Therefore, many applications-including imputation and segmentation and genome annotation (SAGA)-instead use Gaussian models and use a transformation such as log or inverse hyperbolic sine (asinh) to stabilize variance. RESULTS: We show here that existing transformations do not fully stabilize variance in genomic datasets. To solve this issue, we propose VSS, a method that produces variance-stabilized signals for sequencing-based genomic signals. VSS learns the empirical relationship between the mean and variance of a given signal dataset and produces transformed signals that normalize for this dependence. We show that VSS successfully stabilizes variance and that doing so improves downstream applications such as SAGA. VSS will eliminate the need for downstream methods to implement complex mean-variance relationship models, and will enable genomic signals to be easily understood by eye. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/faezeh-bayat/VSS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".