MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative Investigation of MPPT Controller For Grid Connected Photovoltaic System

2020· article· en· W3174410621 on OpenAlexaff
Amr Sarhan, Mohamed A. Kamel, Ahmed T. Hafez, Sidney Givigi

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaximum power point trackingPhotovoltaic systemMaximum power principleComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemParticle swarm optimizationController (irrigation)Hill climbingAutomotive engineeringControl engineeringEngineeringFuzzy logicFuzzy control systemElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)InverterVoltageAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, global warming is attracting the attention of the whole world. One of the main reasons is the increase of CO2causing high pollution levels due to the burning of fossil fuels. The promising performance of green energy encourages the use of solar energy instead of ordinary sources. Photovoltaic (PV) energy is a free energy that requires to reach its Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) to guarantee sufficient power for a long Energy Payback Time (EPBT). In this paper, we introduce several control approaches- Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Sliding Mode Control (SMC)- aiming at the maximum PV system output power with minimum EPBT. To prove the success of these, the results are compared with the results of PV system using Hill Climbing (HC) method, Incremental Conductance (INC) method and Perturb Observation (P & O) technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2020 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)Same topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207