MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174413003 · doi:10.1002/ana.26147

Pathogenic <scp> <i>MAST3</i> </scp> Variants in the <scp>STK</scp> Domain Are Associated with Epilepsy

2021· article· en· W3174413003 on OpenAlexaff
Egidio Spinelli, Kyle R. Christensen, Emily Bryant, Amy Schneider, Jennifer Rakotomamonjy, Alison M. Muir, Jessica Giannelli, Rebecca O. Littlejohn, Elizabeth Roeder, Berkley Schmidt, William G. Wilson, Elysa J. Marco, Kazuhiro Iwama, Satoko Kumada, Tiziana Pisano, Carmen Barba, Annalisa Vetro, Eva H. Brilstra, Richard H. van Jaarsveld, Naomichi Matsumoto, Hadassa Goldberg‐Stern, Patrick W. Carney, P. Ian Andrews, Christelle Moufawad El Achkar, Samuel F. Berkovic, Lance H. Rodan, Kirsty McWalter, Renzo Guerrini, Ingrid E. Scheffer, Heather C. Mefford, Simone Mandelstam, Linda Laux, J Gordon Millichap, Alicia Guemez‐Gamboa, Angus C. Nairn, Gemma L. Carvill

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Neurology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCommon FundOffice of Strategic CoordinationNational Health and Medical Research CouncilJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNIH Office of the DirectorNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeMedical Research CouncilMarch of Dimes FoundationEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentSwebilius FoundationYale UniversityNational Institutes of HealthJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
KeywordsMissense mutationEpilepsyBiologyExome sequencingHEK 293 cellsGeneGeneticsMutationMedicineNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The MAST family of microtubule-associated serine-threonine kinases (STKs) have distinct expression patterns in the developing and mature human and mouse brain. To date, only MAST1 has been conclusively associated with neurological disease, with de novo variants in individuals with a neurodevelopmental disorder, including a mega corpus callosum. METHODS: Using exome sequencing, we identify MAST3 missense variants in individuals with epilepsy. We also assess the effect of these variants on the ability of MAST3 to phosphorylate the target gene product ARPP-16 in HEK293T cells. RESULTS: We identify de novo missense variants in the STK domain in 11 individuals, including 2 recurrent variants p.G510S (n = 5) and p.G515S (n = 3). All 11 individuals had developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, with 8 having normal development prior to seizure onset at <2 years of age. All patients developed multiple seizure types, 9 of 11 patients had seizures triggered by fever and 9 of 11 patients had drug-resistant seizures. In vitro analysis of HEK293T cells transfected with MAST3 cDNA carrying a subset of these patient-specific missense variants demonstrated variable but generally lower expression, with concomitant increased phosphorylation of the MAST3 target, ARPP-16, compared to wild-type. These findings suggest the patient-specific variants may confer MAST3 gain-of-function. Moreover, single-nuclei RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry shows that MAST3 expression is restricted to excitatory neurons in the cortex late in prenatal development and postnatally. INTERPRETATION: In summary, we describe MAST3 as a novel epilepsy-associated gene with a potential gain-of-function pathogenic mechanism that may be primarily restricted to excitatory neurons in the cortex. ANN NEUROL 2021;90:274-284.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of NeurologySame topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207