MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Stabilisation de l’arsenic dans les remblais miniers en pâte cimentée

2013· article· en· W3174427053 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel Coussy, Mostafa Benzaazoua, Bruno Bussière, Denise Blanc, Pierre Moszkowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironnement Ingénierie & Développement · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsPyriteArsenicJarositePyrrhotiteMetallurgyArsenopyriteMining engineeringEnvironmental scienceGeologyMineralogyCopperChalcopyriteMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Backfilling of underground mines is now widely used in hard rock mines. It provides numerous benefits regarding ore recover y (more complete and more flexible ore recover y) and the reduction of environmental impacts (storage of problematic tailings). Cemented paste backfill (CPB) is the main method used in modern mines among the various types of mine backfills, because it provides benefits when used with reactive sulphide mine tailings.These tailings contain frequently iron sulphides (pyrite and pyrrhotite), and can also contain sulphides associated with metals (e.g. copper, zinc, etc.) or metalloids (e.g. arsenic). In the present study, CPB made of As-bearing sulphide tailings, and CPB artificially spiked with As have been prepared, in order to assess the potential for As to be stabilized in these matrices. The chemico-mineralogical speciation of As and the geochemical behaviour of As in these CPB have been studied in details. Moreover, As sorption tests on hydrated cementitious phases as well as a characterization of the microstructure of CPB samples have been carried out to bring complementar y information and to conclude about the interest of As stabilization in CPB. Le remblayage de mines souterraines est devenu une pratique courante et intéressante pour ses nombreux avantages en termes d’exploitation des minerais (plus complète et plus souple) et de réduction des impacts environnementaux (enfouissement de rejets problématiques en surface). Parmi les différents types de remblais miniers, les remblais en pâte (RMPC) connaissent le plus de succès dans les mines modernes, sachant les nombreux avantages qu’ils confèrent en présence de rejets miniers sulfurés potentiellement réactifs. Ces derniers contiennent le plus souvent des sulfures de fer (pyrite et pyrrhotite) mais peuvent aussi contenir des sulfures associés à des métaux (ex. : cuivre, zinc, etc.) et des metalloïdes (ex. : arsenic). Dans cette étude, des RMPC à base de rejets miniers sulfurés arsénifères et des RMPC artificiellement dopés à l’As ont été confectionnés, afin d’évaluer le potentiel de stabilisation de l’As dans ces matrices cimentaires. La spéciation chimicominéralogique de l’As ainsi que son comportement géochimique dans ces matrices a été étudié en détail. Des essais d’adsorption de l’As sur des hydrates cimentaires et une caractérisation de la microstructure des RMPC ont été réalisés pour apporter des informations complémentaires et conclure quant au potentiel et à l’intérêt de sa stabilisation dans les remblais.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironnement Ingénierie & DéveloppementSame topicTailings Management and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207