The effect of supply agility mediation through the relationship between trust and commitment on supply chain performance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the mediating effect of supply agility on the relationship between trust and commitment and supply chain performance. The study examines the direct effect of trust and commitment on supply chain performance, trust and commitment on supply agility and supply agility on supply chain performance. The study also examines the indirect effect of trust and commitment on supply chain performance with supply agility as an intervening variable. The research sample consists of 100 respondents who sell chicken meat in seven districts in Lebak Regency, Banten Province, Indonesia. Data are collected using purposive sampling technique. The statistical tool used is the SmartPLS 3.0 application. The results of this study indicate that; trust has no effect on supply chain performance, commitment has a significant effect on supply chain performance, trust has a significant effect on supply agility, commitment has a significant effect on supply agility, and supply agility has a significant effect on supply chain performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it