MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174459433 · doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101762

Development of secondary urothelial carcinoma following complete response to immune checkpoint inhibitors

2021· article· en· W3174459433 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐Michel Lavoie, Gillian Vandekerkhove, Andrew J. Murtha, Gang Wang, Alexander W. Wyatt, Bernhard J. Eigl

Bibliographic record

VenueUrology Case Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British ColumbiaSurrey Place CentreSurrey Memorial Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBladder Cancer CanadaAstellas Pharma CanadaMerckJanssen PharmaceuticalsAstraZeneca
KeywordsDurvalumabMedicineUrothelial cancerImmune checkpointBladder cancerTremelimumabMetastatic Urothelial CarcinomaAvelumabOncologyImmunotherapyDiseaseMissense mutationCancer researchCancerInternal medicineUrothelial carcinomaMutationNivolumabIpilimumabGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The management of metastatic urothelial cancer is rapidly evolving since immune checkpoint inhibitors were introduced. We present the case of a patient with metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer who had a complete response to durvalumab and tremelimumab. This patient then developed multiple non-invasive papillary bladder tumours. Next-generation sequencing revealed that the tumours shared ancestry with the upper tract cancer, although there were key differences, most notably the presence of a TP53 missense mutation in the upper tract disease that was absent in the bladder tumours. This illustrates an important practice point in the management of exceptional responders to checkpoint inhibitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUrology Case ReportsSame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207