Tubulobulbar complexes in Sertoli cell primary cultures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the seminiferous epithelium, unique double membrane structures termed tubulobulbar complexes (TBCs) develop in association with basal junction complexes between Sertoli cells. These actin‐related structures are thought to internalize intercellular junctions during the movement of spermatocytes from basal to adluminal compartments of the epithelium. We are establishing a primary Sertoli cell culture system to study the role of basal TBCs in junction turnover. We confirm that Sertoli cells isolated from 20 day‐old rat pups morphologically differentiate when grown on Matrigel in Transwells. The cells are high cuboidal to columnar in shape with basal nuclei, and with basal junction complexes similar to the appearance of junction complexes between Sertoli cells in vivo. Significantly, TBCs and TBC‐like structures develop in association with intercellular junctions. Double‐membrane coated‐pits, together with double‐membrane tubular structures capped by coated‐pits are observed in regions related to ectoplasmic specializations. When immunostained for integral junction proteins, “rod‐like” structures are observed to extend into the cell from the periphery. These observations indicate that TBCs are able to develop in differentiated Sertoli cells in culture, making further functional analyses of TBCs possible in vitro. Supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant to AWV. Grant Funding Source : NSERC
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".