MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174505864 · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2021.35639

Review on Repercussions of Covid-19 Pandemic on Construction Sector

2021· article· en· W3174505864 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samiksha P. Sonak

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrunchLivelihoodPrivate sectorUnemploymentBusinessCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Quarter (Canadian coin)Manufacturing sectorGovernment (linguistics)AgricultureCashEconomic sectorSupply chainPandemicGovernment sectorEconomic policyEconomic growthEconomicsEconomyLabour economicsFinanceMarketingGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Covid-19 pandemic has disrupted almost everything related to economic and livelihood activities. This review paper however aims at showing and assessing the negative impacts of Covid-19 over construction sector in India particularly. The construction sector in India being second highest employee intensive sector after agriculture. It had come to an abrupt halt in first quarter of FY2020-21 and this resulted in stopping of supply chain management, major infrastructural projects of government and private entities, different cement, steel and other construction material manufacturing units. Further it resulted in sudden unemployment over millions of Indian employees and workers, in both organized and unorganized sectors related to construction businesses. The lockdown gave rise to many unfair practices in the business of supply chain, one of which is the stockpiling of cement and steel in the initial period of strict lockdown, hence the prices soared up in short time. That’s why estimates of major projects also rose up. On the other hand, the rates of real estates have gone down invariably due to cash crunch in the economy. All these effects and causes are dealt with in this research paper using authentic data in the public domain

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologySame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207