DETERMINATION OF REGIONS SUITABLE FOR AGRICULTURE IN THE GORDON COSENS FOREST OF ONTARIO BY MEANS OF ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS WITH FUZZY LOGIC INFERENCE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with fuzzy logic inference on attributes was employed to determine areas most suitable for agriculture in the Gordon Cosens Forest (GCF) region within the District of Cochrane in northern Ontario, Canada. Attribute layers considered were soil texture, ELC (Ecological Land Classification) moisture regime, slope, canopy height model (CHM), distance to existing road networks and distance to water bodies. Fuzzy logic inference was utilized to rescale the attributes to a normalized range, taking into account preferability, which was then subjected to pairwise comparisons via AHP to determine the attribute layers' weightings. For the study area, the localities identified as most compatible for agricultural development include the southeastern section of the GCF at approximately 30 km south of the community of Fauquier and the westernmost area of the GCF at about 10 km east of Mattice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".