Multispectral LiDAR Point Cloud Classification Using SE-PointNet++
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A multispectral light detection and ranging (LiDAR) system, which simultaneously collects spatial geometric data and multi-wavelength intensity information, opens the door to three-dimensional (3-D) point cloud classification and object recognition. Because of the irregular distribution property of point clouds and the massive data volume, point cloud classification directly from multispectral LiDAR data is still challengeable and questionable. In this paper, a point-wise multispectral LiDAR point cloud classification architecture termed as SE-PointNet++ is proposed via integrating a Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) block with an improved PointNet++ semantic segmentation network. PointNet++ extracts local features from unevenly sampled points and represents local geometrical relationships among the points through multi-scale grouping. The SE block is embedded into PointNet++ to strengthen important channels to increase feature saliency for better point cloud classification. Our SE-PointNet++ architecture has been evaluated on the Titan multispectral LiDAR test datasets and achieved an overall accuracy, a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU), an F1-score, and a Kappa coefficient of 91.16%, 60.15%, 73.14%, and 0.86, respectively. Comparative studies with five established deep learning models confirmed that our proposed SE-PointNet++ achieves promising performance in multispectral LiDAR point cloud classification tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".