MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The impact of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on sleep quality of parkinson’s disease patients

2021· article· en· W3174578841 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTurkish Neurosurgery · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep brain stimulationDepression (economics)DiseaseSubthalamic nucleusSleep (system call)Quality of life (healthcare)Neuromodulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: To investigate the effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) therapy on sleep quality of Parkinson?s Disease (PD) patients and the relationship between sleep, motor symptoms, depression, and adverse effects of dopamine replacement therapies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 26 PD patients have been included and assessed using various tools both 1 week before and 8 months after the STN DBS therapy. The data collection tools were the Unified Parkinson?s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Parkinson?s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Polysomnography. RESULTS: PSQI, ISI, and ESS scores were found to have significantly improved after the STN DBS therapy (p=0.002, p=0.006, p < 0.001, respectively), as were the scores obtained from several PSQI sub-scales, that is, sleep duration, sleep disturbance and daytime dysfunction (p=0.023, p=0.005, p=0.032, respectively). Additionally, Wake Times After Sleep Onset (WASO) (p=0.047) and Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep latency values (p=0.005) were found to have decreased after the STN DBS treatment, whereas REM sleep durations (p=0,028) and REM sleep percentages (p=0.007) were found to have increased, after the STN DBS therapy. No correlation was found between the ESS scores and Levodopa Equivalent Dosage (LED) or between the scores obtained from the sleep scales and the scores obtained from the UPDRS and BDI. There was also no correlation between sleep scores and other PD-related factors. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicated that STN DBS therapy positively affected the PD patients? sleep. This result was attributed to the neuromodulatory effects of the STN DBS independent of the motor symptoms, depression levels, and LED decrease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it