MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174600408 · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i9.16982

Deep Probabilistic Canonical Correlation Analysis

2021· article· en· W3174600408 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanonical correlationProbabilistic logicArtificial intelligenceGenerative grammarInferenceComputer scienceRepresentation (politics)Generative modelSet (abstract data type)Latent variable modelLatent variableInterpretation (philosophy)Machine learningAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a deep generative framework for multi-view learning based on a probabilistic interpretation of canonical correlation analysis (CCA). The model combines a linear multi-view layer in the latent space with deep generative networks as observation models, to decompose the variability in multiple views into a shared latent representation that describes the common underlying sources of variation and a set of viewspecific components. To approximate the posterior distribution of the latent multi-view layer, an efficient variational inference procedure is developed based on the solution of probabilistic CCA. The model is then generalized to an arbitrary number of views. An empirical analysis confirms that the proposed deep multi-view model can discover subtle relationships between multiple views and recover rich representations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it