MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Metabolic Control of Two Dynamic Pools of Diacylglycerol in Budding Yeast

2018· article· en· W3174604563 on OpenAlexaffabout
Suriakarthiga Ganesan, Marjan Tavassoli, Maria Laura Sosa, Kelsey Wagner, Mauricio R. Terebiznik, Vanina Zaremberg

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiacylglycerol kinasePhosphatidylserineCell biologyPhosphatidic acidPhosphatidateBiologySecond messenger systemBuddingPhosphatidylinositolBiochemistryChemistryProtein kinase CMembranePhospholipidSignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The location of lipids and their distributions across cellular membranes have critical biological consequences, particularly for lipids involved in cellular signaling. In this study, diacylglycerol pools were monitored in budding yeast under conditions where lipid homeostasis was altered. Two predominant pools of diacylglycerol were visualized using the C1 domain of mammalian PKCδ fused to GFP. One pool was associated with vacuolar membranes and the other localized to sites of polarized growth. Upon growth resumption, diacylglycerol pools appeared more dynamic than those of phosphatidic acid and phosphatidylserine. During this period, diacylglycerol enriched puncta and vacuolar rings experienced constant morphological changes with clusters of lipid droplets closely attached. Lack of conversion of diacylglycerol to phosphatidate by Dgk1 led to the accumulation of diacylglycerol in a vacuolar associated compartment. Diacylglycerol distribution was strongly affected in cells lacking the phosphatidylserine synthase Cho1/Pss1. Supplementation of lysophosphatidylserine to cho1 cells did not correct mislocalization of DAG, pointing to a role for phosphatidylserine synthesis and traffic in the establishment of cellular diacylglycerol pools. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by a National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada to M.R. Terebiznik and V. Zaremberg. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis→French-language works237,207→