Bibliographic record
Abstract
The enrollment number of Chinese students in North American universities is increasing every year. Even though graduate courses are discussion-based, many university instructors have experienced the "silent Chinese" phenomenon in classrooms. This study looks through investigating the reasons for Chinese international students' silence in classrooms. Basil Bernstein's language code theory was used as a theoretical framework to explain the difficulties international students experience in speaking up in class. From students' narratives, the aim of this study is to understand genuine reasons for their silence so that the school community can better assist students with diverse backgrounds. Using in-depth interviews, this study explores six international Chinese students' experiences studying abroad in a graduate program at a large university in Canada. Three themes were identified from the interviews: First, language proficiency; second, previous schooling experience in China; and third, Chinese typical culture of face. This thesis concludes with implications on how this study to understand Chinese international students' difficulties can bring in great learning opportunities to the classroom and also create a multicultural classroom that values diverse ideas.Keywords: Chinese international students, silence in classrooms, face culture, language codes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".