MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Gestational chronic intermittent hypoxia causes asymmetric growth restriction and alters cholesterol homeostasis in the liver of sprague‐dawley rats

2012· article· en· W3174650224 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Waseem Iqbal, Eric J. Barry, Daniel B. Hardy, John Ciriello

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsOffspringEndocrinologyInternal medicineGestationBiologyCholesterolIntrauterine growth restrictionPregnancyGestational ageMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was done to investigate the effect of chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH) during gestation on the development of offspring. Female Sprague‐Dawley rats were mated, housed individually, and kept on a standard rat chow diet during the study. Pregnant females (n=8) were exposed daily to CIH (6.5% O 2 nadir; 18 cycles/h; 8 h/day) from gestational day‐1 to day‐20. Control (n=6) mothers were exposed similarly to room air. Postnatal day‐1 offspring from CIH mothers showed significantly lower body weights, and lower liver‐to‐body weight ratios. By 12‐wk of age, body weights of growth restricted offspring were significantly greater, as were the liver‐to‐body weight ratios. These offspring also had greater body fat deposition and elevated circulating cholesterol levels at both 6‐wk and 12‐wk of age. Western blot and qPCR analysis showed that CIH offspring had decreased protein and gene expression of markers vital for cholesterol regulation in the liver, including Liver X Receptor (LXR), ABCA1 (cholesterol efflux) and the LDL receptor (cholesterol catabolism). These data show that alteration of the maternal intrauterine environment by gestational CIH has significant consequences on the long‐term development of offspring and increases the disposition of the animals to metabolic diseases in adulthood. Supported by Heart and Stroke Foundation and Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→