MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174654584 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.20.4.a271-c

Sex and aging interact to modulate the rapid onset of arteriolar dilation in mouse skeletal muscle

2006· article· en· W3174654584 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dwayne N. Jackson, Steven S. Segal

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsSkeletal muscleVasodilationInternal medicineEndocrinologySenescenceStimulus (psychology)ChemistryMedicineBiologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aging is associated with a reduction in blood flow to skeletal muscle and diminished exercise capacity. However, little is understood of how aging affects arteriolar dynamics in working skeletal muscle. We tested the hypothesis that aging impairs the rapid onset of vasodilation (ROV) in mouse gluteus maximus muscle. Responses of second‐order arterioles [diameter: rest, 17 ± 1 μm; max (SNP), 29 ± 1 μm] to single tetanic contractions (100 Hz) were assessed in anesthetized C57Bl/6 mice using intravital microscopy in Young (3 mo) males (YM; n=7) and females (YF; n=5) and in Old (~20 mo) males (OM; n=7) and females (OF; n=6). With increasing stimulus duration (100–1000 ms), the magnitude of dilation increased (from 1 to 7 μm) in YM, YF, and OF (P<0.05) yet ROV was blunted consistently by >50% in OM (P<0.05). In contrast, 30‐s rhythmic contractions at 2, 4, and 8 Hz resulted in steady‐state dilations that increased with frequency (from 2 to 8 μm; P<0.05) and were not different between groups. Remarkably, the decrement in ROV in OM was reversed (P<0.05) with α‐adrenoreceptor blockade (1 μM phentolamine). These data support the hypothesis that aging selectively impairs ROV in Old male mice through increased activation of α‐adrenoreceptors. (NIH R21‐AG19347 and HSFC)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207