MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3174662759 · doi:10.1161/circ.140.suppl_2.286

Abstract 286: Cerebral Microstructure Disruptions are Associated With Poor Neurologic Outcomes in Comatose Cardiac Arrest Patients

2019· article· en· W3174662759 on OpenAlexaff
Ona Wu, Eric S. Rosenthal, Gaston Cudeumus-Deseda, Brittany Mills, Brian L. Edlow, W. Taylor Kimberly, M. Ning, Edilberto Amorim De Cerqueira Filho, M. Brandon Westover, Brandon L. Hancock, William A. Copen, Pamela W. Schaefer, Joseph T. Giacino, David M. Greer

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsKimberly-Clark (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFractional anisotropyKurtosisCardiologyLogistic regressionDiffusion MRIProspective cohort studyInternal medicineAnesthesiaMagnetic resonance imagingRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: For cardiac arrest survivors who are initially comatose after restoration of spontaneous circulation, the extent of brain injury and expected recovery are crucial for management decisions. Advanced diffusion imaging approaches may provide additional insight into microstructural integrity and potential for arousal recovery (AR). Methods: Multi-shell diffusion imaging was acquired in a prospective study. Neurite orientation dispersion (OD), intracellular volume fraction (ICVF), free water fraction (ISO), mean kurtosis (MK), axial kurtosis (AK), radial kurtosis (RK), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) were calculated (see Figure). Median whole-brain values in patients with AR by discharge were compared with those with no AR and to controls (ANOVA, post-hoc 2-tailed Wilcoxon test). Multivariable backward stepwise logistic regression was performed to predict AR. Results: 19 patients (mean ±SD 48±23 y, 42% men) and 5 controls (37±19 y, 40% men) were analyzed (10 patients with AR, 9 without). Median [IQR] time-to-MRI was 5 [4-8] days. Patients with no AR had higher AK (P=0.037), and RK (P=.045) than those with AR. Controls exhibited higher FA than either AR (P=.009) or no AR (P=.02), lower MK than no AR (P=.02), lower AK than no AR (P=.02), lower RK than no AR (P=0.02), lower OD than no AR (P=.008), and lower ICVF than no AR (P=.046). AK (P=.049) and ICVF (P=.01) were found in multivariable regression to be significant predictors of AR with 81% area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Discussion: Advanced diffusion imaging metrics, AK and ICVF, were able to predict which patients were likely to regain consciousness, with 81% AUC. Despite the small sample size, we note statistically significant differences using more sensitive measures of microstructural injury compared to more commonly used diffusivity metrics. Further investigation of advanced diffusion imaging methods is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→