MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174719514 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107902

Flower phenological events and duration pattern is influenced by temperature and elevation in Dhauladhar mountain range of Lesser Himalaya

2021· article· en· W3174719514 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Indicators · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, IndiaMinistry of Environment - Saskatchewan
KeywordsPhenologyHerbaceous plantBiologyAltitude (triangle)Elevation (ballistics)Range (aeronautics)Abundance (ecology)HorticultureBotanyEcologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studying phenology is undeniably one of the most effective ways to monitor and perceive how a particular plant species interact and respond to varying environmental conditions. In this study, the shifts in flowering phenological events of 24 herbaceous species with the changing elevation and temperature were observed in Dhauladhar Mountain range of Lesser Himalaya. Five permanent plots (20 × 20 m2) were established from 2,000 m to 4,000 m elevation at each rising 500 m distance for the documentation of herbaceous flora. Abundance-based documentation of flowering phenological events (onset of flowering duration [OFD] ≥ 10% to 30%, the peak of flowering duration [PFD] > 30% to 80%, the end of flowering duration [EFD] > 80% and total flowering duration [FD] as the difference of end and onset of flowering DOY) was done in each plot. The onset, the peak, and the end of the flowering day of the year (DOY) were recorded at 20%, 55%, and 90% floral abundance, respectively, from 1st of January. Upon analyses, the Linear-mixed effects model depicted significant differences in the flowering phenological events with elevation and soil temperature. The onset of flowering DOY and peak of the flowering DOY varied significantly with soil temperature gradient, while the end of flowering DOY showed non-significant interaction. The linear model of ANOVA demonstrated that OFD, PFD, EFD and FD varied significantly with elevation at p < 0.001. FD increased with elevation for most of the species, whereas two species, Aquilegia pubiflora and Primula denticulata, showed early incidences of flowering compared to other species. Temperature played an imperative role in influencing the day of initiation and duration of these phenological events. High plasticity of flowering phenological events is advantageous in high elevation regions where pollinators are scarcely present. Therefore, documenting shifting incidences of flowering phenological events would help the researcher to effectively predict climate change effects on alpine communities in near future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it