THE WESTERN ONTARIO ROTATOR CUFF INDEX (WORC) - THE POLISH LANGUAGE VERSION THE POLISH LANGUAGE VERSION OF THE WORC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cuff (WORC) jest specyficznym narzędziem badawczym do oceny jakości życia pacjentów z różnymi problemami w obrębie stożka rotatorów.Badania podjęto ze względu na brak w Polsce tego typu narzędzia badawczego.Uzyskano zgodę na utworzenie wersji polskiej WORC od właściciela praw autorskich -Sharon Griffin. CelCelem niniejszej pracy jest przedstawienie etapów adaptacji lingwistycznej angielskiej wersji kwestionariusza WORC do wersji polskiej.Materiał i metody W procesie adaptacji wykorzystano rekomendowaną przez Mapi Research Institute procedurę tłumaczenia narzędzi badawczych, pozwalającą na zminimalizowanie błędów wynikających z przekładu.W proces tłumaczenia zaangażowani byli 2 tłumacze języka angielskiego i 1 nativespeaker od kilku lat mieszkający w Polsce oraz autorzy pracy.W celu ewaluacji dokonanego
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".