MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174734412 · doi:10.33137/q.i..v41i2.36772

Montagne e treni: due topoi purgatoriali nel secondo Novecento italiano Lucia Masetti

2021· article· it· W3174734412 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lucia Masetti

Bibliographic record

VenueQuaderni d italianistica · 2021
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicItalian Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tanto l’ascesa al monte quanto il viaggio via treno possono assumere nella letteratura contemporanea una valenza purgatoriale. La montagna in particolare riveste un duplice valore: è il luogo dell’affermazione e del perfezionamento del singolo, e insieme apre un passaggio verso la dimensione dell’eternità, dell’essenza. Similmente il viaggio ferroviario – ideale prosecutore del viaggio per mare – costituisce sia uno strumento di esplorazione, sia una via di collegamento con l’oltremondo. Entrambi dunque assommano in sé quelle che Freud chiama pulsione di vita e pulsione di morte, la prima intesa come istanza espansiva, la seconda come ritorno all’unità indifferenziata.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1740.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuaderni d italianisticaSame topicItalian Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207