Investigating the depolarization property of skin tissue by degree of polarization uniformity contrast using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The depolarization property of skin has been found to be important for skin cancer detection. Previous techniques based on light polarization lack the capability of depth differentiation. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) has the advantage of both depth-resolved 3D imaging and high sensitivity to polarization. In this study, we investigate the depolarization property of skin tissue using PS-OCT, especially with the degree of polarization uniformity (DOPU) contrast. Well designed skin phantoms with various surface roughness levels and optical properties mimicking skin are imaged by PS-OCT and the DOPU values are quantified. The result shows a correlation between DOPU and surface roughness, where a higher roughness corresponds to a lower DOPU value. An index matching experiment with a water layer confirms the impact of surface condition on light depolarization. Refraction of backscattered photons on the surface boundary is attributed to the broadening of backscattering angle and thus depolarization. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time the impact of surface roughness on DOPU is reported and its mechanism explained. Furthermore, through preliminary in vivo skin imaging, the capability of DOPU in detecting depolarization in skin is demonstrated. By utilizing the 3D imaging from PS-OCT, DOPU can offer a high-resolution depth differentiation and quantification of depolarization in skin tissue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".