MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Loss of Intestinal Epithelial AMPK Does Not Alter Susceptibility to Acute Chemical Colitis or Bacterial Infection

2019· article· en· W3174858236 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie J. King, Hashini Batugedara, Russell G. Jones, Meera G. Nair, Declan F. McCole

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsAMPKColitisAMP-activated protein kinaseInflammationProtein kinase AIntestinal epitheliumIntestinal permeabilityMedicineImmunologyBiologyKinaseEpitheliumCell biologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AMP‐Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) is a master regulator of cellular energy status. Its primary actions are mediated by its alpha catalytic subunit, which has two isoforms. Previous evidence in mice has suggested that loss of an individual AMPK‐α isoform compromises critical functions of the intestinal epithelium such as tight junction permeability while intact AMPK activity is protective against mucosal inflammation. These processes are essential to maintain the intestinal barrier and prevent chronic inflammation. However, AMPK‐dependent effects under cellular stress conditions have not been consistent and appear context‐dependent. Additionally, published studies have not confirmed whether AMPK is necessary and sufficient for these effects. The goals of this study were to determine if AMPK is required to protect from mouse models of acute colitis. Methods Deletion of AMPKα specifically in intestinal epithelial cells was accomplished by crossing Prkaa1/2 floxed mice with Villin‐Cre mice. Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) colitis was induced in conventionally housed intestinal epithelial cell‐specific AMPK knockout (AMPKα ΔIEC KO ) and AMPK floxed (AMPKα fl/fl ) mice. 40kDa DSS was administered at 2.5% in drinking water ad libitum for 5 days followed by 3 days of water. Disease activity index was calculated from daily measures of body weight, stool consistency, and presence of hemaoccult. On the day of sacrifice mice were orally gavaged with 4kDa FITC‐dextran and blood was collected after 4 hours to determine intestinal permeability. Mice were sacrificed and intestinal tissues were flash frozen. Citrobacter rodentium infection was performed in mice housed under specific pathogen‐free (SPF) conditions following overnight treatment of 50ng/mL streptomycin. Mice were orally gavaged with ~10 8 CFU of C. rodentium (DBS100 streptomycin‐resistant strain). Fecal bacterial load was determined regularly until sacrifice on day 10 post‐infection. Colon and extra‐intestinal tissues (mesenteric lymph nodes, spleen, and liver) were excised to determine bacterial burden. Results AMPKα ΔIEC KO mice did not exhibit increased susceptibility to 2.5% DSS compared to AMPKα fl/fl mice as determined by similar changes in body weight and disease activity index throughout the course of disease. In addition, there were no significant differences in colon weight or length after DSS (n = 4 – 15). AMPKα ΔIEC KO mice do not appear to have significantly increased intestinal permeability after DSS treatment. To test if AMPK is important for responses to enteric infection, mice were infected with Citrobacter rodentium , a mouse model of enteropathogenic (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) infection in humans. Infected mice had identical increases in fecal bacterial burden over time (~10 7 CFU/g, n = 3–6) and loss of AMPK did not affect disease progression. In addition, AMPK deficiency did not increase bacterial invasion of extra‐intestinal tissues (n = 3–4). Conclusions These data suggest that AMPK plays only a minor role in intestinal epithelial function and suggests that protection from colitis is mediated by AMPK‐independent pathways. Support or Funding Information NIH 2R01DK091281 (DFM) This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicVitamin D Research Studies→French-language works237,207→