MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174865279 · doi:10.4000/moussons.7458

« Payer les mots, acheter la moisson ». Réflexion sur des formes d’échange en Indonésie orientale (Lamaholot, Flores)

2021· article· fr· W3174865279 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMoussons · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtEthnologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À la pointe orientale de l’île de Flores en Indonésie, le rituel tutu marin (« dire prononcer ») constitue un mode d’échange majeur entre les humains et les invisibles. Il consiste dans la déclamation d’une suite de poèmes, associés à des offrandes sanglantes. Cet acte oratoire et poétique peut être tantôt considéré comme un « achat », tantôt comme un « paiement », tantôt comme un don de nourriture. Deux cas ethnographiques sont présentés : dans le premier, les humains « achètent » la moisson ; dans le second, ils « paient les mots ». Que font ces vers, ordonnés sous une forme soignée et prononcés à toute allure ? En quoi peuvent-ils payer quelque chose et à qui ? La synthèse des deux cas révèle un mode de relation entre les humains et les esprits qui implique un échange « coûteux » sans qu’aucune monnaie ne circule.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it