MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3174877555

An Empirical Study on Foreign Language Anxiety of Non-English Major Students: Take the Sophomores in Inner Mongolia University of Technology as an Example

2014· article· en· W3174877555 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Meihua Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in literature and language · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeign languageForeign language anxietyPsychologyAnxietyInner mongoliaMathematics educationScale (ratio)Field (mathematics)Test (biology)Likert scaleSecond-language acquisitionLanguage acquisitionLinguisticsChinaDevelopmental psychologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foreign Language Anxiety in English learning is one of the major concerns in the field of second language acquisition. In most cases, FLA is debilitating to English language learners due to their communication comprehension, lack of confidence and learning interests, etc. This paper aims at researching the causal relationship between the FLA and the English learning performance, as well as the internal validity of ELA among Chinese EFL learners. In order to analyze the cause of FLA, research has been conducted employing the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale. In the survey, the above anxiety scale is applied in the field research of 200 non-English major sophomore students in Inner Mongolia University of Technology. Through statistics analysis of the Means score, Std. Deviation and T-test, correlation between ELA and gender (male and female), discipline (arts and science) are drawn respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in literature and languageSame topicEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningFrench-language works237,207