Combined Improved Dirichlet Models and Deep Learning Models for Road Extraction from Remote Sensing Images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Combining Dirichlet Mixture Models (DMM) with deep learning models for road extraction is an attractive study topic. Benefiting from DMM, the manually labeling work is alleviated. However, DMM suffers from high computational complexity due to pixel by pixel computations. Also, traditional constant parameter settings of DMM may not be suitable for different target images. To address the above problems, we propose an improved DMM which embeds superpixel strategy and sparse representation into DMM. In our road extraction framework, we first use improved DMM to filter out most backgrounds. Then, a trained deep CNN model is used for further precise road area recognition. To further promote the processing speed, we also apply the superpixel scanning strategy for CNN models. We tested our method on a Shaoshan dataset and proved that our method not only can achieve better results than other compared state-of-the-art image segmentation methods, but the processing speed and accuracy of DMM are also improved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it