MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3174954218 · doi:10.2337/db21-19-or

19-OR: Maternal Diabetes Is Associated with Adverse Diabetes Characteristics and Accelerated Onset of Complications in Youth with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) in TODAY

2021· article· en· W3174954218 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elvira Isganaitis, Rachana Shah, Steven D. Chernausek, Ryan M. Farrell, Mitchell E. Geffner, Joyce Keady, Megan M. Kelsey, Bereket Tesfaldet, Jeanie B. Tryggestad, Michelle Van Name

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGlycemicDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesHazard ratioPregnancyInternal medicineGestational diabetesType 1 diabetesEndocrinologyObstetricsGestationConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Prenatal exposures, including parental nutrition and diabetes (DM) status, are increasingly viewed as risk factors for future cardiometabolic health. There are currently no data on effects of parental DM on disease progression or complications in youth-onset T2D. Aims: To analyze effects of parental history of DM on glycemic outcomes and complications in the TODAY study. Methods: Participants (n=699) aged 10-14 yr with newly diagnosed T2D were enrolled at 14 U.S. centers and followed for up to 15 yr. Subjects had negative islet autoantibodies and BMI >= 85th %. Information about DM diagnosis in mothers of participants was available for 621 participants [Never (MN) =301; During pregnancy (MD) =218; After pregnancy (MA)=102)] and in biological fathers in 519 (No DM=352; Paternal DM=167). Results: Maternal, but not paternal, DM was associated with accelerated loss of glycemic control, defined as HbA1c >8% for over 6 months (p < 0.0001). Participants whose mothers had diabetes had 60% higher risk of loss of glycemic control [MD vs. MN hazard ratio (HR): 1.58 (1.28, 1.95), p < 0.0001; MA vs. MN HR: 1.57 (1.20, 2.04), p = 0.0009]. Similarly, maternal, but not paternal, diabetes was associated with glomerular hyperfiltration [MD vs. MN HR: 1.58 (1.18-2.1), p = 0.0021; MA vs. MN HR: 1.56 (1.08, 2.24), p = 0.0170;], diabetic retinopathy (MD: 50.0%; MA: 59.7%; MN: 41.8%, p=0.0439), and pulse wave velocity indices reflecting heart rate variability, including SD of normal R-R interval [(SDNN), MD: 42 ± 26 ms; MA: 41 ± 26 ms; MN: 54 ± 31 ms; p = 0.0005] and proportion of successive NN intervals greater than 50 ms [(pNN50%), MD: 14.1 ± 19.4; MA: 16.2 ± 21.5; MN: 21.9 ± 23.5; p = 0.0069], after 10 to 15 yr of follow-up. Associations were maintained after adjusting for multiple confounders. Conclusions: Maternal, but not paternal, diabetes is associated with adverse diabetes outcomes and accelerated onset of complications in their offspring with T2D in TODAY. Disclosure E. M. Isganaitis: None. M. A. Van name: None. R. Shah: None. S. Chernausek: None. R. M. Farrell: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Tandem Diabetes Care. M. Geffner: Advisory Panel; Self; Daiichi Sankyo, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer Inc., Consultant; Self; Gilead Sciences, Inc., Other Relationship; Self; Ascendis Pharma A/S, McGraw-Hill, UpToDate, Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk. J. Keady: None. M. M. Kelsey: Other Relationship; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. B. Tesfaldet: None. J. B. Tryggestad: None. Funding National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK61212, U01DK61230, U01DK61239, U01DK61242, U01DK61254)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→