KernelFaRer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Well-crafted libraries deliver much higher performance than code generated by sophisticated application programmers using advanced optimizing compilers. When a code pattern for which a well-tuned library implementation exists is found in the source code of an application, the highest performing solution is to replace the pattern with a call to the library. Idiom-recognition solutions in the past either required pattern matching machinery that was outside of the compilation framework or provided a very brittle solution that would fail even for minor variants in the pattern source code. This article introduces Kernel Find & Replacer ( KernelFaRer ), an idiom recognizer implemented entirely in the existing LLVM compiler framework. The versatility of KernelFaRer is demonstrated by matching and replacing two linear algebra idioms, general matrix-matrix multiplication (GEMM), and symmetric rank-2k update (SYR2K). Both GEMM and SYR2K are used extensively in scientific computation, and GEMM is also a central building block for deep learning and computer graphics algorithms. The idiom recognition in KernelFaRer is much more robust than alternative solutions, has a much lower compilation overhead, and is fully integrated in the broadly used LLVM compilation tools. KernelFaRer replaces existing GEMM and SYR2K idioms with computations performed by BLAS, Eigen, MKL (Intel’s x86), ESSL (IBM’s PowerPC), and BLIS (AMD). Gains in performance that reach 2000× over hand-crafted source code compiled at the highest optimization level demonstrate that replacing application code with library call is a performant solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.092 | 0.086 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".