MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175092619 · doi:10.1063/5.0057604

Time-resolved broadband impulsive stimulated Brillouin scattering in single crystal hematite

2021· article· en· W3175092619 on OpenAlexafffund
Patrick Gicala, Meixin Cheng, Tyler S. Lott, Kai Du, Sang‐Wook Cheong, Ariel A. Petruk, Kostyantyn Pichugin, Germán Sciaini

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence FundCanada Research ChairsUniversity of WaterlooCanada Foundation for InnovationOntario Research FoundationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsBrillouin scatteringHematiteBrillouin zoneScatteringOpticsMaterials scienceSingle crystalCrystal (programming language)DielectricBroadbandReflectivityTransient (computer programming)Molecular physicsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsComputational physicsOptoelectronicsLaserNuclear magnetic resonanceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impulsive stimulated Brillouin scattering (ISBS) has emerged as a noninvasive means to determine the elastic properties of transparent materials. Here, we report on time-resolved broadband ISBS reflectivity measurements in single crystal hematite, α-Fe2O3. We found that the observed transient reflectivity changes are best described by the known strain propagation model (SPM) and introduced a simple derivation of the ISBS-SPM formula based on ray tracing, which accounts for the presence of the interface. Measurements at different incident probe beam angles illustrate a plausible approach toward determining the speed of sound in transparent media without any prior knowledge of their dielectric properties and vice versa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207