Physics and Chemistry of Radiation Driven Cloud Evolution. [C ii] Kinematics of IC 59, and IC 63
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We used high-resolution [C ii] 158 μm mapping of two nebulae IC 59 and IC 63 from SOFIA/upGREAT in conjunction with ancillary data of the gas, dust, and polarization to probe the kinematics, structure, and magnetic properties of their photodissociation regions (PDRs). The nebulae are part of the Sh 2-185 H ii region that is illuminated by the B0 IVe star γ Cas. The velocity structure of each PDR changes with distance from γ Cas, which is consistent with driving by the radiation. Based on previous far-ultraviolet (FUV) flux measurements of, and the known distance to, γ Cas, along with the predictions of 3D distances to the clouds, we estimated the FUV radiation field strength (G 0) at the clouds. Assuming negligible extinction between the star and clouds, we find their 3D distances from γ Cas. For IC 63, our results are consistent with earlier estimates of distance from Andersson et al., locating the cloud at ∼2 pc from γ Cas at an angle of 58° to the plane of the sky behind the star. For IC 59, we derive a distance of 4.5 pc at an angle of 70° in front of the star. We do not detect any significant correlation between the orientation of the magnetic field and the velocity gradients of [C ii] gas, which indicates a moderate magnetic field strength. The kinetic energy in IC 63 is estimated to be an order of 10 higher than the magnetic energies. This suggests that kinetic pressure in this nebula is dominant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".