MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175097561

캐나다의 지역 공공시설과 청소년 프로그램에 관한 연구 - 공공정책과 벤쿠버시 지역사회를 중심으로 -

2017· article· ko· W3175097561 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
최진희

Bibliographic record

Venue청소년시설환경 · 2017
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealthcare innovation and challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic policyPublic administrationGovernment (linguistics)BusinessState (computer science)Social policyLocal governmentWelfarePolitical scienceEconomic growthEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The public welfare policy in Canada is considered to have been well established as a federal state for the community system. The basis of public policy in Canada is the community, based social welfare system, and the decentralized operating policy of the federal government has expanded and developed with the organizational change of the public system. In other words, the decentralized government's public system is deeply related to the social welfare policy of each province, each city, and each community member. The purpose of this study is to examine the main concept of the federal government 's national public policy and the operation guidelines of the public system, and to examine the community system by studying the case of a city. Therefore, I want to analyze the public system that is centered on the community in Vancouver, one of the major cities in Canada. In addition, I will analyze the network of local public facilities, the youth policy, and the operating system of youth programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue청소년시설환경Same topicHealthcare innovation and challengesFrench-language works237,207