MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Valorisation du verre à bouteille comme addition fine dans les bétons autoplaçants

2013· article· en· W3175112758 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mourad Behim, Tahar Ali Boucetta

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironnement Ingénierie & Développement · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlass recyclingPozzolanCementFiller (materials)MineralogyWaste managementEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceChemistryMetallurgyComposite materialEngineeringPortland cement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the region of Annaba (Algeria), the colored glass bottles are not sorted or recycled. It should be noted that in some countries like Canada, the recycling of colored glass bottles is not currently viable; the storage would be cheaper [Oxford Brookes University, 2004]. But, the valorization of glass bottles in the concrete could constitute an interesting ecological and economical alternative, allowing the removal of bulky waste and pollutants and their qualification as a new source of building materials. Technically, glass bottles contain significant amounts of alkalis that can cause detrimental effects to concrete in relation to alkali-silica or alkali-aggregate reaction if the glass is used in coarse form. In the other hand, many authors [Chen et al, 2006] agree that the glass causes a beneficial behaviour associated with the pozzolanic reaction when used in powder form. Indeed, our work is a contribution to the valorization of powder glass bottles for substituting the limestone filler traditionally used as an addition in self compacting concrete (SCC). The results obtained show a beneficial behaviour of glass powder on the characteristics, of fresh and hardened self-compacting concrete to a dosage of 30 to 60% compared to the mass of cement. Dans la région d’Annaba (Algérie), les bouteilles en verre coloré ne sont ni triées ni recyclées. Il faut signaler aussi que dans certains pays comme le Canada, le recyclage des bouteilles en verre coloré n’est pas viable actuellement, son entreposage coûterait moins cher [Oxford Brookes University, 2004]. Cependant, la valorisation du verre à bouteille dans le béton pourrait constituer une alternative écologique et économique intéressante, permettant l’élimination de décharges encombrantes et polluantes et sa qualification comme une nouvelle source de matériaux de construction. Sur le plan technique, les verres à bouteille contiennent des quantités importantes d’alcalin pouvant entraîner des effets préjudiciables sur le béton en relation avec les réactions alcali-silice ou alcali-granulat si le verre est utilisé sous forme granulaire. Par contre, de nombreux auteurs [Chen et al, 2006] conviennent que le verre entraîne un comportement bénéfique associé à la réaction pouzzolanique s’il est utilisé sous forme de poudre. En effet notre travail est une contribution à la valorisation du verre à bouteille sous forme de poudre en remplacement du filler calcaire traditionnellement utilisé comme addition dans les bétons autoplaçants (BAP). Les résultats obtenus montrent un comportement bénéfique de la poudre de verre sur les caractéristiques des bétons autoplaçants aussi bien à l’état frais qu’à l’état durci pour un dosage allant de 30 à 60 % par rapport à la masse du ciment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironnement Ingénierie & DéveloppementSame topicConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207