MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175114282

Encounters with Non-Human Intelligence in Mexico, the Origin of Consciousness & the Quantum Consciousness Model: The Sol Collazo Case (Part I)

2021· article· en· W3175114282 on OpenAlexaff
Raul Valverde

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific GOD Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicParanormal Experiences and Beliefs
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsciousnessHumanityField (mathematics)SpiritualityHuman intelligenceQuantumEpistemologyCognitive sciencePsychologySociologyPhilosophyPhysicsQuantum mechanicsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, several people in Mexico have revealed their encounters with non-human intelligent beings. Many times, these encounters have the purpose of revealing information related to spirituality, consciousness and cosmology. The quantum consciousness paradigm explains that our consciousness is immortal, non-local and can work independently of the physical brain and supports a multidimensional view of the human mind.  The article aims at presenting a model revealed to non-human intelligence contactee, Sol Collazo, that supports the existence of a quantum field that is responsible for the generation of the reality that we perceive. The same model also reveals the different energies that make consciousness and how they interact with this quantum field. The article also presents the experiences of the author including a contact with the Pleiadians that are benevolent beings that serve humanity in our evolution process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.014
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific GOD JournalSame topicParanormal Experiences and BeliefsFrench-language works237,207