MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175120204 · doi:10.1109/wiiat50758.2020.00087

Analytics of Similar-Sounding Names from the Web with Phonetic Based Clustering

2020· article· en· W3175120204 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicData Quality and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsComputer scienceCluster analysisBig dataTask (project management)Web intelligenceWeb miningWorld Wide WebSemantic WebAnalyticsData scienceFocus (optics)Depth soundingData WebInformation retrievalThe InternetWeb pageData miningArtificial intelligenceWeb modelingGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With advancements in modern technology in the current era, very large volumes of big data have been generated and collected in numerous real-life applications. These have formed a connected world comprising webs of agents, data, people, things and trust. Some of these webs have also emerged in health and smart living. As valuable information and knowledge is embedded in these rich sets of webs, web intelligence is in demand. In this paper, we focus a data science task of web content mining. In particular, we conduct big web data analytics to cluster similar-sounding names based on their phonemes. Our phonetic based clustering groups similar-sounding names together, which helps users deal with name disambiguation problems by identifying web records on the same person but with multiple similar-sounding names.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.254
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Quality and ManagementFrench-language works237,207