MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Inhibition of the receptor of advanced glycation reverses pulmonary arterial hypertension

2013· article· en· W3175128535 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jolyane Meloche, Antony Courchesne, Marjorie Barrier, Marie‐Pier Tremblay, Sandra Breuils‐Bonnet, Ève Tremblay, Steeve Provencher, Sébastien Bonnet

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRage (emotion)Downregulation and upregulationGlycationReceptorApoptosisMedicineEndocrinologyCancer researchBMPR2Internal medicinePulmonary hypertensionLungChemistryBone morphogenetic proteinBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary arterial (PA) hypertension (PAH) is a vasculopathy characterized by enhanced PA smooth muscle cells (PASMC) proliferation and suppressed apoptosis. A recent proteomic analysis of PAH lungs demonstrated that the receptor of advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) is one of the most upregulated proteins in PAH patients. We hypothesized that RAGE could play a critical role in PAH etiology and progression. We demonstrated a specific RAGE overexpression in PAH lungs. In human PASMC, we showed that RAGE was implicated in the proliferative and apoptosis‐resistant phenotype. Recent studies demonstrated an altered BMPR2 (Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor 2)/PPARγ (Peroxisome Proliferator‐Activated Receptor gamma) axis in PAH. We showed that RAGE is accountable for BMPR2/PPARγ downregulation, thus regulating proliferation and apoptosis. In vivo , RAGE inhibition (siRNA nebulization) in rats with Sugen‐induced PAH showed decreased PA pressure and right ventricular hypertrophy, associated with a significant improvement in lung perfusion and decreased PA wall thickness. To conclude, w e demonstrated the implication of RAGE in PAH etiology. Thus, RAGE inhibitors, which are in clinical phase II for Alzheimer's disease, represent potential therapeutic agents for PAH treatment. A Canadian Thoracic Society scholarship to JM and Canadian Institutes of Health Research grants to SB supported this work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→