MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3175132430 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-3275

Synchronous Eocene deformation recorded on either side of a major Miocene thrust bounding the Almyropotamos tectonic window in Evia, Greece

2021· article· en· W3175132430 on OpenAlexaff
Taylor Ducharme, Iwona Klonowska, David Schneider, Bernhard Grasemann, Kostantinos Soukis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNappeGeologyTectonicsSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Southern Evia in Greece exposes an inverted high pressure-low temperature (HP-LT) metamorphic sequence that has been loosely correlated with the Cycladic Blueschist Unit (CBU). On the island, the CBU is divided into the metavolcanic and ophiolitic Ochi Nappe and predominantly metacarbonate Styra Nappe. A lower-grade unit, the Almyropotamos Nappe, is exposed in the core of a N-S trending antiform and comprises Eocene platform carbonates overlain by metaflysch. The Almyropotamos Nappe occupies a tectonic window defined by the Evia Thrust, a brittle-ductile fault zone that emplaced the Ochi and Styra nappes atop the Almyropotamos Nappe. New multiple single-grain white mica total fusion 40Ar/39Ar ages indicate that deformation occurred along the Evia Thrust at 25-23 Ma. White mica 40Ar/39Ar data on either side of the tectonic window record Eocene dates between 40 and 32 Ma, consistent with previously published 40Ar/39Ar dates and a single Rb-Sr age of c. 30 Ma. These ages broadly coincide with estimates for the timing of NE-directed thrusting of the Ochi Nappe over the Styra Nappe. Strain associated with thrusting localized as cylindrical folds in Styra marbles, with fold axes parallel to the stretching lineation and a clear strain gradient increasing toward the upper contact with the Ochi Nappe. The most prominent structures in the Ochi Nappe are a strong L-S fabric defined by acicular blue amphibole and type-3 refold structures with fold axes trending parallel to the NE-SW oriented stretching lineation. Whereas the Ochi Nappe and Styra Nappe locally preserve peak blueschist facies mineral assemblages, all three units commonly display evidence only for retrogressed initial HP-LT assemblages in the form of ferroglaucophane inclusions in albite porphyroblasts. Isochemical phase diagrams calculated in the Na2O-CaO-K2O-FeO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O-TiO2±O2 system support minimum peak metamorphic conditions of 12.5 ± 1.5 kbar and 465 ± 75 °C for an Ochi Nappe blueschist, and 6.0 ± 0.5 kbar and 315 ± 15 °C for an albite mica schist from the Evia Thrust. Peak P-T conditions for the Ochi Nappe support a metamorphic history more closely resembling that of the Lower Cycladic Blueschist Nappe, indicating that the entire section of the CBU exposed on Evia lies below the Trans-Cycladic Thrust. The Early Miocene ages from the Evia Thrust overlap with the proposed timing for the initiation of bivergent greenschist facies extension in the Cyclades. The remainder of the region, including high-strain corridors within individual nappes such as the Almyropotamos Thrust, uniformly records Eocene deformation ages. The similarity in 40Ar/39Ar ages across the tectonic window contrasts with age relationships observed in similar tectonic packages on Lavrion, and suggests that regional scale deformation persisted until the Late Eocene before strain became localized in brittle-ductile corridors by the Early Miocene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→