EFFECTS OF A PROSTHETIC FOOT WITH INCREASED CORONAL ADAPTABILITY ON CROSS-SLOPE WALKING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Walking on cross-slopes is a common but challenging task for persons with lower limb amputation. The uneven ground and the resulting functional leg length discrepancy in this situation requires adaptability of both user and prosthesis. OBJECTIVE(S): This study investigated the effects of a novel prosthetic foot that offers adaptability on cross-slope surfaces, using instrumented gait analysis and patient-reported outcomes. Moreover, the results were compared with two common prosthetic feet. METHODOLOGY: Twelve individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation and ten able-bodied control subjects participated in this randomized cross-over study. Participants walked on level ground and ±10° inclined cross-slopes at a self-selected walking speed. There were three prosthetic foot interventions: Triton Side Flex (TSF), Triton LP and Pro-Flex LP. The accommodation time for each foot was at least 4 weeks. The main outcome measures were as follows: frontal plane adaptation of shoe and prosthetic foot keel, mediolateral course of the center of pressure, ground reaction force in vertical and mediolateral direction, external knee adduction moment, gait speed, stance phase duration, step length and step width. Patient-reported outcomes assessed were the Activities Specific Balanced Confidence (ABC) scale, Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS M) and Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire (ADL-Q). FINDINGS: The TSF prosthetic foot adapted both faster and to a greater extent to the cross-slope conditions compared to the Triton LP and Pro-Flex LP. The graphs for the mediolateral center of pressure course and mediolateral ground reaction force showed a distinct grouping for level ground and ±10° cross-slopes, similar to control subjects. In the ADL-Q, participants reported a higher level of perceived safety and comfort when using the TSF on cross-slopes. Eight out of twelve participants preferred the TSF over the reference. CONCLUSION: The frontal plane adaptation characteristics of the TSF prosthetic foot appear to be beneficial to the user and thus may enhance locomotion on uneven ground – specifically on cross-slopes. Layman's Abstract Walking on cross-slopes is a common but challenging task for persons with lower limb amputation. The adaptability of prostheses is limited. Users alter gait strategies to cope with uneven ground. The prosthetic foot is a central component of a lower limb prosthesis. This study investigated if a novel prosthetic foot with greater adaptability is beneficial on cross-slopes. Twelve individuals with transtibial amputation (ITTAs) took part in the study. In addition, ten abled-bodied persons were measured as controls. The ITTAs were fitted with the novel foot and a reference foot. The accommodation time for each foot was four weeks at least. Afterwards gait data and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. The analyzed gait data showed clear differences in terrain compliance for the measured feet. The novel foot adapts both faster and to a greater extent to the cross-slope conditions. The self-reported outcome measures revealed better comfort and perceived safety when using the adaptive foot concept in comparison to the commercial reference. These results suggest that the adaptation characteristics of the novel foot concept are beneficial to the user. Thus, it may enhance locomotion on uneven ground such as cross-slopes. Article PDF Link: How To Cite: Altenburg B, Ernst M, Maciejasz P, Schmalz T, Braatz F, Gerke H, Bellmann M. Effects of a prosthetic foot with increased coronal adaptability on cross-slope walking. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2021;Volume 4, Issue 1, No.7. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i1.35206 Corresponding Author: Björn Altenburg,Research Biomechanics, Ottobock SE & Co. KGaA, Göttingen, Germany.E-Mail: Bjoern.altenburg@ottobock.comORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3484-4346
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".