Application of time series model and deep learning method in measuring the impact of COVID-19 on agriculture in Hubei, China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Taking the agricultural situation of Hubei Province as the research object, this paper uses the time series ARIMA model, ARMA model and deep learning LSTM neural network model to explore the impact of COVID-19 on the agriculture of Hubei Province. Three main indicators are screened out to measure the development of agricultural economy, that is, gross regional product, gross output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery, agricultural product production price index. Based on the quarterly data of indicators from 2001 to 2019 from the National Bureau of Statistics, three indicators in Hubei Province in the first quarter and the second quarter of 2020 are predicted by using the deep learning-based time series ARIMA model, ARMA model and LSTM neural network model. By comparing the predicted data with the real data, the impact of COVID-19 is measured on the agricultural situation of Hubei Province. It was found that COVID-19 had a great impact on the agricultural situation of Hubei Province in both of the first and second quarters of 2020, with the impact in the first quarter being greater than that in the second quarter. At the same time, the prediction accuracy of the two methods is compared to find that the time series model is more effective and reliable in predicting the agricultural product price index. The LSTM neural network model with a long and short term memory has a good prediction effect on the regional gross product and the total output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".