MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175156914

МІЖНАРОДНИЙ ФІНАНСОВИЙ АУТСОРСИНГ ТА СВІТОВІ ТЕНДЕНЦІЇ ЙОГО РОЗВИТКУ

2019· article· uk· W3175156914 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
С. О. Мащенко, Natalia Zakharchenko, О. М. Вертелецька

Bibliographic record

VenueЕкономічний простір · 2019
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinancial marketFinancial servicesBusinessFinanceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper analyzes the basic types of autsourcing. It is defined, that most companies on the modern stage pay attention to ІТ- autsourcing and autsourcing of business-projects. It is proven the dynamics of world autsourcing services market. It is defined, that the autsourcing services market had a tendency to the increase at the beginning from 2000th but from 2014 they have insignificant decline. It is distinguished the leading countries that specialized at autsourcing operations, such like the USA, Canada, Peru, Mexico, France, Great Britain and India. The financial autsourcing and its basic kinds are distinguished. The dynamics development of financial autsourcing is analyzed. It is defined, that at the beginning from 2014 he has insignificant reduction. It has been concluded that it is related to completion of term of large autsourcing contracts in leading countries. At the market of financial autsourcing two basic segments are economic America region and economic Europe region are allocated. It has been aduced that in these two segments the value of commercial financial autsourcing contracts has a tendency to increase. It has been adeced that it is related with the appearance of new countries which to become a familiar with to the spheres of financial autsourcing and grant of financial autsourcing services. The market of autsourcing services is analysed. It is educed that the sphere of financial autsourcing is not widespread and needs developing at the territory of our country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueЕкономічний простірSame topicEconomic Issues in UkraineFrench-language works237,207